Most adults need about 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day, which is 56 grams if you weigh 70 kg (154 lb). If you lift weights, are over 65, or are dieting, the evidence supports 1.2 to 1.6 g/kg instead. Here is how to find your number.
What is the short answer?
The official recommended dietary allowance is 0.8 grams of protein per kilogram of body weight per day. That figure is a minimum set to prevent deficiency in healthy sedentary adults, not an optimum for people who train, are losing weight, or are over 65. Researchers who study protein requirements have argued for years that the RDA is a floor rather than a target, because it was derived from nitrogen-balance studies that systematically underestimate what preserves muscle in real life (Phillips, 2016).
The practical formula is simple. Take your body weight in kilograms, multiply it by the number that matches your situation, and you have your daily target in grams. To convert pounds to kilograms, divide by 2.2.
Here is what that looks like across common body weights. The middle column is what most healthy adults should treat as a floor; the right-hand columns are where the evidence points for people who are training or trying to hold onto muscle while losing fat.
| Body weight | Baseline 0.8 g/kg | Active / over 65 1.2 g/kg | Building muscle 1.6 g/kg |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 kg (110 lb) | 40 g | 60 g | 80 g |
| 60 kg (132 lb) | 48 g | 72 g | 96 g |
| 70 kg (154 lb) | 56 g | 84 g | 112 g |
| 80 kg (176 lb) | 64 g | 96 g | 128 g |
| 90 kg (198 lb) | 72 g | 108 g | 144 g |
| 100 kg (220 lb) | 80 g | 120 g | 160 g |
How much protein do you need? Read the dose ladder
Rather than argue about one number, it helps to see the range as a ladder. Each rung describes a different job your body is doing, and each has its own evidence base. Find the rung that matches your situation and use the grams per kilogram beside it.
This is the RDA. It prevents deficiency and covers the basic turnover of body proteins in a person who is not training. If you are sedentary, eat a mixed diet, and feel fine, this is enough to avoid a problem.
- Set to prevent deficiency, not to optimise body composition
- Appropriate for adults with no training load and no weight-loss goal
- Roughly 15 percent of calories on a 2,000 calorie diet
Older adults respond less efficiently to the same amount of protein, a phenomenon called anabolic resistance. An international expert group reviewed the evidence and recommended 1.0 to 1.2 g/kg per day for healthy older people, rising to 1.2 to 1.5 g/kg during illness or recovery (Bauer, 2013).
- Muscle loss begins around age 40 and accelerates after 60
- Higher intake is associated with lower frailty risk in cohort studies (Nanri, 2022)
- Protein alone is not enough — resistance training is what makes it count
This is the range with the strongest evidence for people doing resistance training. A meta-analysis of 49 trials found that protein supplementation increased gains in strength and muscle size, with the benefit flattening out at roughly 1.6 g/kg per day (Morton, 2018). Beyond that point, extra protein is used for energy rather than for more muscle.
- Applies to people training consistently, not to one gym session a week
- The plateau is around 1.6 g/kg, with wide confidence intervals up to about 2.2
- Total daily intake matters more than the exact timing of each shake
When calories drop, the body starts breaking down muscle for energy. Higher protein intakes protect lean mass during an energy deficit, which is why the top rung sits above the muscle-building range. A meta-analysis of energy-restricted diets found that higher-protein groups lost more fat mass and preserved more lean mass than standard-protein groups, though the difference was moderate rather than dramatic (Wycherley, 2012).
- Useful during a deliberate calorie deficit, not during a bulk
- Protein is the most satiating macronutrient, which helps adherence (Kohanmoo, 2020)
- No extra muscle-building benefit above roughly 2.2 g/kg for most people
Two things are worth saying plainly. First, the ladder is not a competition — the top rung is not better for a person whose goal is simply to be healthy. Second, the numbers describe daily intake averaged over a week, not a requirement you have to hit before midnight on any single day.
Protein is one input. Recovery is the other.
Hitting a protein target only pays off if the rest of the equation holds — sleep, temperature and recovery load, which most people guess at. The Ultrahuman Ring AIR tracks those trends so the adjustment comes from your own data rather than a feeling. It tracks; it does not diagnose or treat anything.
$349 one-time, no subscription. A tracking device, not a medical device.
AllAboutHealthToday may receive a commission at no additional cost to you.
Does it matter when you eat protein?
Somewhat, but less than the internet suggests. Muscle protein synthesis responds to each dose of protein, and that response appears to max out at roughly 0.4 grams per kilogram per meal in young adults. A review of the dose-response literature concluded that spreading intake across four meals of about 0.4 g/kg each lands close to the 1.6 g/kg daily target that the training evidence supports (Schoenfeld & Aragon, 2018).
For a 70 kg adult, that is about 28 grams of protein per meal, four times a day. In practice, most people already hit the daily total but concentrate almost all of it at dinner, which leaves breakfast and lunch well short.
| Meal | Target at 70 kg | What that looks like |
|---|---|---|
| Breakfast | 25–30 g | Greek yogurt with eggs, or oats with milk and whey |
| Lunch | 25–30 g | Chicken, tuna, or tofu with lentils or beans |
| Dinner | 30–40 g | Salmon, beef, or a large tofu portion with a grain |
| Snack | 15–25 g | Cottage cheese, edamame, or a protein shake |
What about the anabolic window after training?
The 30-minute window is a marketing invention more than a physiological deadline. What the evidence supports is that total daily protein intake and consistent training drive adaptation, and that eating protein within a few hours of training is sufficient. If you train fasted first thing in the morning, getting 25 to 30 grams in shortly afterwards is a sensible habit rather than an emergency. If you had a meal two hours before training, you are already covered.
What does 30 grams of protein look like?
The number on a label and the number on your plate are not the same thing, because foods differ enormously in how much protein they deliver per calorie. Two hundred grams of firm tofu and 100 grams of chicken breast both land near 30 grams of protein, but the tofu carries roughly 80 more calories to get there.
That matters if you are dieting. It matters less if you are simply trying to eat enough, in which case the higher-calorie sources are often easier to fit in.
If you are training seriously, the calorie cost of your protein sources interacts with your overall energy budget — the same reason aerobic base work and protein intake are usually planned together rather than separately.
| Food | Portion | Protein | Calories |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chicken breast, cooked | 100 g | 31 g | 165 |
| Salmon, cooked | 140 g | 30 g | 290 |
| Greek yogurt, 0% fat | 300 g | 28 g | 170 |
| Eggs | 4 large | 25 g | 280 |
| Firm tofu | 200 g | 30 g | 290 |
| Lentils, cooked | 300 g | 27 g | 350 |
| Cottage cheese | 225 g | 25 g | 180 |
| Whey isolate | 1 scoop, 30 g | 25 g | 110 |
Does high protein damage your kidneys?
For people with healthy kidneys, the evidence does not support the claim. A 12-month randomised trial in adults consuming higher protein intakes found no difference in kidney function compared with lower intakes (Devries, 2018). The persistent worry comes from an observed effect rather than a demonstrated harm: higher protein intake raises glomerular filtration rate, which is the kidney working harder, not the kidney being damaged.
A 2024 review of athletes and bodybuilders examined that distinction directly, asking whether the hyperfiltration seen with very high protein intakes translates into chronic kidney disease. It concluded that the picture is not settled for people with pre-existing risk factors, while acknowledging that in healthy individuals the adaptation appears reversible and physiological rather than pathological (de Lorenzo, 2024).
There is also a bone-health myth to retire. A meta-analysis from the National Osteoporosis Foundation found that higher protein intake was not associated with harm to bone and may carry a small benefit for bone mineral density (Shams-White, 2017).
Can you get enough protein from plants?
Yes, with attention to quantity and distribution. A 2025 controlled trial compared a well-balanced vegan diet with an omnivorous diet and found no compromise in daily mixed muscle protein synthesis rates (Domić, 2025). Plant proteins are generally lower in leucine and less digestible, so the practical adjustment is to eat slightly more total protein and to spread it across meals rather than concentrate it.
A review of plant proteins and exercise reached the same conclusion from the performance side: plant-based diets can support training adaptations when protein dose, quality, and total intake are managed rather than assumed (Kerksick, 2021).
How do you improve plant protein quality?
- Combine complementary sources. Legumes are low in methionine, grains are low in lysine; together they cover both.
- Use isolates where convenience matters. Soy, pea, and blended plant protein powders carry a higher protein density than whole foods.
- Raise the total by roughly 10 to 20 percent. This compensates for lower digestibility and leucine content.
- Anchor breakfast. Plant-based diets usually fail on protein at breakfast, not at dinner.
If you are building a plant-forward diet, the practical breakdown of which sources carry the most usable protein is covered in the plant protein ranking guide, and the micronutrients that need watching on a plant-heavy diet are covered in this overview of common deficiencies.
Does more protein help with weight loss?
Modestly, and mostly through adherence rather than metabolism. A meta-analysis of energy-restricted diets found that higher-protein groups lost more total weight and more fat mass, and retained more lean mass, than standard-protein groups on the same calories (Wycherley, 2012). The effect sizes were real but not large, and the lean-mass preservation is the more valuable half of the result.
Part of the mechanism is satiety. A systematic review of protein and appetite-regulating hormones found that protein intake increases fullness signalling and reduces subsequent energy intake, with the effect varying by dose and by how much of the diet is protein (Kohanmoo, 2020). If you are stuck at a plateau, higher protein at breakfast is one of the few changes that reliably reduces what you eat later in the day — the rest of that problem is covered in this breakdown of weight-loss plateaus.
Two caveats are worth stating. Body composition changes around menopause make fat loss harder to achieve on the same intake for reasons that are hormonal rather than moral, and where fat sits matters independently of how much there is — the difference between subcutaneous and visceral fat is a metabolic one, not cosmetic.
How much protein do older adults need, in practice?
The recommendation from the ladder above — 1.0 to 1.2 g/kg for healthy older adults — only works if it is actually eaten, and survey data consistently shows older adults under-consuming protein at breakfast. Three changes do most of the work:
- Move protein earlier. A 30-gram breakfast instead of 8 grams changes the day more than a larger dinner.
- Train against it. Protein without resistance exercise slows decline but does not reverse it; the combination is what the trial evidence supports. The specific strength work is covered in this guide to preventing muscle loss after 40.
- Do not cut protein while cutting calories. Weight loss after 60 removes muscle as well as fat unless protein intake stays high.
Ageing muscle also loses its ability to respond to small doses of protein, which is why the older-adult target sits above the RDA rather than at it. The broader biology of that decline is covered in the hallmarks of ageing, and the minerals that interact with protein metabolism — including the different forms of magnesium — are worth reviewing if you are also supplementing.
Common questions about protein intake
How much protein is too much?
There is no sharp toxicity threshold for healthy people. The evidence for muscle-building benefit plateaus around 1.6 g/kg and shows no added benefit above roughly 2.2 g/kg. Very high intakes mostly add calories, cost, and digestive discomfort. The genuine caution applies to people with existing kidney disease, who should follow clinical guidance.
Can you eat all your protein in one meal?
You can, and the body will still use it, but you get less muscle-building signal than from the same total spread across three or four meals. The 0.4 g/kg per-meal figure is where the response saturates, so a single 120-gram dose does not produce three times the effect of a 40-gram dose.
Is 100 grams of protein a day too much?
For most adults, no. At 70 kg, 100 grams works out to about 1.4 g/kg, which sits inside the range supported for people who train. For a 50 kg sedentary adult it is 2.0 g/kg — above need, but not harmful. The number only means something relative to body weight and goal.
Does protein make you gain weight?
Excess calories do, and protein is not exempt from that. Protein is, however, the most satiating macronutrient and the one most consistently linked to preserving lean mass during a deficit. High-protein diets are associated with better weight outcomes in trials, not worse ones.
Should I count plant protein the same as animal protein?
Not exactly. Plant proteins are typically lower in leucine and slightly less digestible, so most guidance suggests raising total intake by around 10 to 20 percent when the diet is predominantly plant-based. The controlled trial evidence says a well-constructed vegan diet supports muscle protein synthesis fine.
Do I need a protein supplement?
No. Supplements are convenient, not necessary, and the meta-analytic benefit comes from total protein rather than from powder specifically. If you already reach your target from food, a shake adds cost and calories rather than results. If you struggle to reach it, whey or a plant blend is the cheapest fix.
Sources
- Phillips SM. Protein requirements beyond the RDA. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016. PMID 26960445
- Bauer J, et al. Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people (PROT-AGE). J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013. PMID 23867520
- Morton RW, et al. Protein supplementation and resistance training: systematic review and meta-regression. Br J Sports Med. 2018. PMID 28698222
- Schoenfeld BJ, Aragon AA. How much protein can the body use in a single meal? J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2018. PMID 29497353
- Wycherley TP, et al. Energy-restricted high-protein versus standard-protein diets: meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012. PMID 23097268
- Kohanmoo A, et al. Protein consumption and appetite-regulating hormones: systematic review. Physiol Behav. 2020. PMID 32768415
- Devries MC, et al. Kidney function in healthy adults consuming higher versus lower protein. J Nutr. 2018. PMID 30383278
- de Lorenzo A, et al. High protein diets and glomerular hyperfiltration in athletes. Sports Med. 2024. PMID 39196487
- Shams-White MM, et al. Dietary protein and bone health: meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017. PMID 28404575
- Domić J, et al. Vegan versus omnivorous diet and muscle protein synthesis. J Nutr. 2025. PMID 39732437
- Kerksick CM, et al. Plant proteins and exercise. Nutrients. 2021. PMID 34200501
- Nanri H, et al. Adequate protein intake and frailty in older adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2022. PMID 35166309




